Accurate assessment of burn wound depth at an early stage is crucial to avoid unnecessary surgery or potential hypertrophic scarring. It is clinically proven that the status of skin microcirculation can be used to estimate burn wound depth. Superficial dermal burns will show a higher skin perfusion as compared to normal skin, whereas the perfusion is compromised in deeper dermal burns.

Blood perfusion imaging has been recognized as an excellent tool to estimate burn depth and its value in predicting the healing capacity of a burn wound has been well established. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDI or LDPI) is used in many burn centers in standard clinical practice to assess burn wound depth and healing potential. Laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA or LSCI) provides high resolution, high quality perfusion images in a fraction of the time needed for producing an LDI image. There is growing scientific evidence 12 that LASCA can be used in the same way.
The PeriCam PSI System provides the user with instant, “live” images of the burn area, presenting valuable information regarding the healing potential of the burn wound.

PeriCam PSI System on cart Examination results showed on computer screen
Graph showing wound healing progress

PeriCam PSI System

  • Objective burn depth assessment
  • Non-invasive
  • Flexible user friendly software

Follow the wound healing process

Increased blood flow in a burn indicates that the microcirculation is functioning and that there is a higher degree of wound healing potential. However, if skin blood flow is low or absent, burns will likely heal very slowly, and surgery will be needed to prevent infections and scarring. It is possible to evaluate the healing progress by taking repeated images at different intervals after injury. PIMSoft application software used to operate the blood perfusion imagers from Perimed include several features that facilitate this work.

PeriCam PSI

Compare uninjured and injured skin

Specific regions of interest (ROIs) can be defined before, during or after a completed examination. In addition, ROIs may be implemented during sections of a run. This advanced ROI handling makes it possible to define reference areas of “uninjured skin”, that can be compared to “injured skin” allowing for better evaluation and understanding of the burn wound.

Burn on foot healing progress
Burn on hand healing progress

Laser speckle blood perfusion imaging of superficial burn wound on hand using the PeriCam PSI NR

Burn on child shoulder healing progress

Case example: Assessment of scald burns in children using Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging

Erik Tesselaar, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Sweden

In Sweden, patients with skin burns that are classified as high-risk are referred to one of the two highly specialized burn units, one of which is at the University Hospital in Linköping. These include patients with a burn area of more than 10%, patients with deep burns, or burn injuries on hands or feet.

To prevent infections and the formation of scar tissue after a deep burn, it is important to very early excise the injured tissue and to replace it with a skin graft. This shortens hospital stay and reduces costs. A major problem is to know early whether a burn is deep, and will need grafting, or whether it is superficial and will heal by itself. Accurate assessment of the depth of a burn at an early stage is therefore very important in clinical decision-making.

It has been known for a long time that the presence of an intact microvasculature is a good predictor of wound healing in burns, and Laser Doppler perfusion imaging in burn wounds has proven to be very accurate in predicting healing time. A limitation of laser Doppler perfusion imaging is that it takes a relatively long time (seconds to minutes) to measure the perfusion in a burn. Apart from the practical disadvantage of the measurement taking a long time, laser Doppler imaging also tends to be affected by motion artefacts leading to inaccurate measurements, particularly in children.

During the last five years, we have therefore been using the PeriCam PSI system both in our research and clinically for the assessment of skin burns, mainly because this technique allows for very fast perfusion imaging in a relatively large area of skin. Basically, the system makes it possible to collect images of skin burns within a fraction of a second.

In our initial studies in which we used the PeriCam PSI system, we found that perfusion in scalds in children shows characteristic changes during the first 15 days after injury, and that these changes depend on the burn depth (see figure). The difference in perfusion between wounds that heal spontaneously within 15 days and wounds that need surgery is at its highest between 3 and 5 days after injury. This suggested to us that that to predict burn outcome, perfusion should optimally be measured between 3 and 5 days after injury.

Therefore, we decided to determine the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of LSCI in the assessment of the healing time of scalds. We basically found that the perfusion in scalds between 3–4 days after injury is highly predictive of healing outcome. We also found that the predictive value can be further improved by doing an early perfusion measurement within 24 h after injury and looking at the change in perfusion over time.

Currently, the PeriCam PSI system is permanently stationed at the burn unit and is used regularly to aid in the assessment of burn severity.

Grafer Tesselaar

The mean (SD) perfusion in scald burns of different severity in children, as measured using the Pericam PSI system during the first 24 hours and subsequent 15 days after the injury (N=149).

Wound Tesselaar

Example of perfusion in two scald burns with two different healing times. On the upper row, a wound on the right upper and lower arm of is shown which contains regions that healed between 9 and 17 days. Perfusion images A to E are acquired at 14 hours, 4 days, 6 days, 8 days and 15 days after the injury. On the lower row, a wound on the upper arm of another patient is shown, which contains different regions that did not heal after 14 days and subsequently required surgery. Perfusion images F to J are acquired at 5 hours, 3 days, 6 days, 8 days and 10 days after the injury.

Read more
See references


  • Mirdell R, Farnebo S, Sjöberg F, Tesselaar E (2018). Accuracy of laser speckle contrast imaging in the assessment of pediatric scald wounds. Burns, 44(1):90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.06.010.    
  • Mirdell R, Iredahl F, Sjöberg F, Farnebo S, Tesselaar E (2016). Microvascular blood flow in scalds in children and its relation to duration of wound healing: A study using laser speckle contrast imaging. Burns, 42(3):648-54. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.12.005.    
  • Lindahl F, Tesselaar E, Sjöberg F. Assessing paediatric scald injuries using Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging. Burns, 2013 Jun;39(4):662-6. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.09.018. Epub 2012 Oct 23.    
WordPress Lightbox Plugin